RESEARCH, WITH CONTEXT.Original sources. Clear limitations.Our approach
RSRetatrutide Safety ReviewSCIENCE MADE READABLE
Back to the reading collection

RETATRUTIDE SAFETY REVIEW / SOURCE INDEX

The papers behind the safety discussion.

An adverse-event percentage needs a denominator, a comparator and a reporting window. The original papers indexed here are those cited in this safety review, with a route back to the guide that explains their relevance.

A brief record cannot replace a paper’s full safety tables. Check event definitions, treatment discontinuation, follow-up and the population included in the analysis. A reported event is not automatically proof of causation, and an unobserved event is not proof of zero risk.

4 distinct original-paper links cited across 3 guides in this edition. Each link is counted once, even when several articles cite it.

Showing 4 of 4 original-paper links.

Retatrutide2023
Randomised trial

Triple-Hormone-Receptor Agonist Retatrutide for Obesity — A Phase 2 Trial (opens the original source in a new tab)

New England Journal of Medicine

Design
Phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial; 48 weeks. Primary endpoint at week 24.
Population / setting
Adults with obesity, or overweight plus at least one weight-related condition.
Sample size
n = 338

What was observed
The highest studied arm had mean weight change of −17.5% at the primary 24-week endpoint versus −1.6% with placebo. At the secondary 48-week endpoint, changes were −24.2% versus −2.1%. Gastrointestinal events and increases in heart rate were reported.

Keep in view
This phase 2 result estimates effects in the studied arms and population, not an approved indication or a long-term cardiovascular outcome. The frequently quoted 24.2% is a secondary 48-week result, not the primary endpoint. Funded by Eli Lilly.

Open the original paper (opens in a new tab)

WHY THIS SOURCE IS HERE

Retatrutide
Original publication

Bellido et al. (2026): TRIUMPH-2 (opens the original source in a new tab)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Open the original paper (opens in a new tab)

WHY THIS SOURCE IS HERE

THE RESEARCH NETWORK

Two destinations.
One commitment to context.

Explore PepTup Europe and Echo Peptides, the research-material brands connected to this publication. Echo’s public study hub is one of our editorial sources; original papers are linked separately.

These are commercial relationships. A paper about a molecule does not validate a supplier’s product or establish suitability for human use.

Preparing your reading window…